Legal Opinion

Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange v. Commissioner of Insurance

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 26, 1982No. Docket 60097PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Per curiam

On September 9, 1981, the circuit court upheld an order issued by respondent, Commissioner of Insurance, finding that petitioner, Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange, had violated MCL 500.2027(a)(ii); MSA 24.12027(a)(ii). Petitioner appeals as of right.

When this suit began, petitionr sold no-fault automobile insurance to people under age 21 only if they happened to reside with a parent or guardian who at the time of application was either already insured or about to become insured with petitioner. On December 12, 1978, respondent issued Insurance Bureau Bulletin 78-27 which stated…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Bell Aerospace Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Smith v. City CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  4. American Way Service Corp. v. Commissioner of InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Attorney General Ex Rel. Commissioner of Insurance v. Michigan Surety Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Amerada Hess Corp. v. ConradNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  2. McGill v. Auto Ass'n of MichMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Southfield Police Officers Ass'n v. SouthfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Dykstra v. Department of Natural ResourcesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Wardlow v. Great Lakes Express Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1983

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API