Legal Opinion

Schinzel v. Department of Corrections

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 28, 1983No. Docket 60373PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff, an inmate at the Kinross Correctional Facility, brings this original action pursuant to MCL 600.4401; MSA 27A.4401, and GCR 1963, 710.7, 714.1(1), seeking a writ of mandamus ordering the defendants to comply with the Administrative; Procedures Act’s (APA) requirements for processing a rule before prohibiting inmates at the facility from receiving postage stamps sent through the mail. Plaintiff began this action after failing to prevail in the institutional grievance procedure. This Court issued an order directing the defendants to show cause why the writ of mandamus should not be…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Michigan Farm Bureau v. Bureau of Workmen's CompensationMichigan Supreme Court · 1980

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Floyd Spruytte v. Richard Walters and Ronald SchinkCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
  2. Fraternal Order of Police, Montgomery County Lodge No. 35 v. MehrlingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  3. Detroit Base Coalition for the Human Rights of the Handicapped v. Department of Social ServicesMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Clonlara, Inc v. State Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Martin v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Supreme Court · 1986

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API