Legal Opinion

Wallace v. Bradshaw

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 15, 1891PublishedCited by 15 opinions

On error to the Supreme Court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Beasley, Chief Justice.

This suit that has produced this writ of error was brought to recover the penalty denounced in section 53 of the act concerning roads (Rev., p. 1006) against a citizen who, after notice, refuses to do his quota of work on the public highway.

It does not seem necessary to state in detail either the facts or the statutory regulations connected with the present controversy, inasmuch as the question to be decided is purely an abstract one relative to the meaning of a provision of the constitution of the state. It will suffice for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Renter v. BauerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1866

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Jackson v. Michigan Corrections CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Gallegos v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Hamar Theatres, Inc. v. CryanDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1973
  4. Mobile County v. State Ex Rel. CammackSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  5. Kent v. Borough of MendhamNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API