Legal Opinion

Kent v. Borough of Mendham

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided July 9, 1970PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

111 N.J. Super. 67 (1970)

267 A.2d 73

HERBERT E. KENT, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

v.

THE BOROUGH OF MENDHAM, ETC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued March 9, 1970.

Decided July 9, 1970.

Before Judges KILKENNY, LABRECQUE and LEONARD.

Mr. Edward Sachar argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Sachar, Sachar & Bernstein, attorneys; Mr. Norman Schulaner, on the brief).

Mr. Thomas L. Morrissey argued the cause for respondents (Messrs. Carpenter, Bennett & Morrissey, attorneys; Mr. Robert E Turtz, on the brief).

The opinion of the court was delivered…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. New Jersey Turnpike Authority v. ParsonsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
  2. Ajamian v. SchlangerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
  3. Loboda v. Township of ClarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
  4. Robbins v. City of JerseySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  5. Falcone v. Middlesex County Medical SocietySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1966

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kohler v. BarnesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
  2. Alongi v. SchatzmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
  3. E. Rutherford Industrial Park v. StateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972
  4. Cervase v. Kawaida Towers, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
  5. Wayne Tenants Council v. Wayne Tp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API