Wright v. Avenson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
Appeal by the defendant Doran from the order granting a new trial.
The memorandum accompanying the order granting a new trial concludes thus: “It is on the ground of errors of law in the admission of evidence at the trial upon cross-examination of the plaintiff over the objection of plaintiff.’s counsel that the order granting a new trial herein has been made.” This makes the order appeal-able, and subject to a reversal unless there were errors of law in the record prejudicially affecting the party against whom the verdict went. Such errors need not be confined to the one deemed and specified…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McAlpine v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Crowley v. Burns Boiler & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Skaaraas v. FinneganSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- Fleckten v. SpicerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Hewson-Herzog Supply Co. v. Minnesota Brick Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Nadeau v. MelinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- Tiedje v. HaneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Lloyd v. Locke-Paddon Land Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935