Crowley v. Burns Boiler & Manufacturing Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for St. Louis county to recover $7,500 for a breach of contract. The case was tried before Dibell, J., and a jury, which rendered a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $623.40. From a judgment entered pursuant to the verdict, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
ELLIOTT, J. ■
On August 25, 1903, the respondent the Crowley Electric Company entered into a contract with the village of Two Harbors by the terms of which it agreed to furnish material for, and do the work of installing certain parts of an electric light plant for the village. The contract called, among other things, for a certain boiler to be used for the generation of steam with which to run the plant. On September 14, 1903, the appellant, the Burns Boiler & Manufacturing Company, and respondent entered into a contract by which the appellant agreed to sell and deliver, on board the cars at…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Booth v. . Spuyten Duyvil Rolling Mill Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Guetzkow Bros. v. A. H. Andrews & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
- Todd v. . GambleNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Theiss v. WeissSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
- State v. YatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Groves v. John Wunder Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Salo v. Duluth & Iron Range RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Madson v. ChristensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Drager v. SeegertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Baessetti v. Shenango Furnace Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.