Legal Opinion

Fleckten v. Spicer

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 21, 1896No. Nos. 9602-(175)PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of tbé district court for Kandiyohi county, Powers, J., denying a motion for a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtCanty, J.

On April 28, 1890, plaintiff purchased: from defendant a quarter section of land in Kandiyohi county, and received from him a bond for deed, whereby he agreed to convey the same to her, “by good and sufficient deed of conveyance,” on payment of $1,600, and interest at the rate of 7 per cent, per annum, according to her eight promissory notes, made by her to him, and dated that day, each for the sum of $200, one of which notes would fall due on November 1, 1891, and one on the 1st of November in each of the following seven years. The vendee also agreed on her part to pay all taxes falling due…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hathaway v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1872
  2. Lancoure v. DupreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  3. Erickson v. BennetSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Graham Investment Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  2. Scheerschmidt v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  3. Beck v. StaatsNebraska Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Nelson v. GjestrumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  5. Vallentyne v. Immigration Land Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API