State v. Jones
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRANCH, Justice.
We first consider defendant’s contention that he is entitled to a new trial because of the argument of the district attorney.
Defense counsel noted an exception to that portion of the district attorney’s argument made at the guilt determination phase of the trial in which the district attorney stated, “Now you know, if you do err in this case he [defendant] has the right of appeal. The State doesn’t have that. State has no right of appeal from a case like this.”
Ordinarily it is the duty of defense counsel to immediately object to an improper argument by the district attorney so…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. McMorrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- State v. DockerySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- State v. FinchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- Caldwell v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- California v. RamosSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Sawyer v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- State v. RoseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
- State v. GoodmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.