Legal Opinion

Flores v. Coffield Warehouse Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 23, 1984No. 9251PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLEIL, Justice.

Javier Flores appeals from a summary judgment granted in favor of Coffield Warehouse Company. Each side concedes that there is no disputed material fact issue. The issue before us is whether the facts establish that Coffield is not a “common carrier by railroad,” as used in the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S. C.A. §§ 51-60 (1972). We conclude that Coffield was not a common carrier by railroad and therefore uphold the summary judgment in favor of Coffield.

While working for Coffield Warehouse Company, Flores was directed to repair a grain hopper conveyer belt located on…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wilcox v. St. Mary's University of San Antonio, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Wells Fargo & Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Lone Star Steel Company v. Lois McGeeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  4. Romeo L. Janelle v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  5. Peter Bruce Mahfood v. Continental Grain Company and Abc Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nichols v. Pabtex, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2001
  2. Nixson v. Mobil Oil Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1996
  3. In Re Demaree ReedTexas Supreme Court · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API