Legal Opinion

In Re Private Complaint of Adams

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 13, 2000PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECK, J.:

¶ 1 In this appeal we decide inter alia what evidence a trial court may consider when it reviews a district attorney’s denial of a private criminal complaint. We hold that the trial court may review all evidence that the district attorney considered in making her decision and is not limited to reviewing the four corners of the private criminal complaint. We affirm.

¶ 2 While he was on the street protesting President Clinton’s appearance in Philadelphia, appellant Donald Adams was involved in a physical confrontation with members of the Teamsters Union. Television crews captured the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CooperSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Piscanio AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Commonwealth v. JurySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Commonwealth v. PetroskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. In Re UllmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. In Re Private Criminal Complaint of WilsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Commonwealth v. McCalmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. In Re Private Criminal Complaints of RaffertySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. In Re: Private Criminal Complaint D. MilesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API