Commonwealth v. Petroski
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Judge.
In this submitted case, we are asked to determine whether the denial of the constitutional right to a direct appeal from judgment of sentence may be cured by filing a petition for post-conviction relief based solely upon the alleged ineffectiveness of trial counsel in failing to follow the client’s instructions. We hold that the Post Conviction Relief Act requires that a petitioner both plead and prove facts establishing that the violation of the constitutional right or the ineffectiveness of counsel so undermined the truth-determining process as to render a finding of guilt…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Commonwealth v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. PettusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Commonwealth v. YagerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Commonwealth v. StockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Commonwealth v. MorrisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LantzySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Commonwealth v. HallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Commonwealth, Aplt v. DescaresSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Commonwealth v. EllerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Commonwealth v. HallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.