Legal Opinion
In re Bowen
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided February 28, 1974No. Patent Appeal No. 9135PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RICH, Judge.
This appeal is from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals, adhered to on reconsideration, affirming the rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 112 of claims 1 and 3-11 of application serial No. 766,192, filed October 9, 1968, entitled “Polymerization Pre-Filter.” The board stated under Rule 196(c) that, in the absence of a new ground of rejection, claim 2 would be allowed if rewritten in independent form with changes indicated by the board, and appellant has apparently filed an amendment complying with the board’s statement, thus placing claim 2 in condition for allowance. We…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Application of Joseph D. FisherCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
- In re SmytheCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
- Application of Carl A. Lukach, Setha G. Olson and Harold M. SpurlinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- Application of Alfred Marzocchi and Richard C. HortonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- Application of Gordon Henry Cook and Peter Arnold MerigoldCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Studiengesellschaft Kohle Mbh, as Trustee for the Max-Planck-Institut Fur Kohlenforschung v. Eastman Kodak CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- In re WertheimCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
- In re HoganCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
- United States v. Telectronics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- In re RasmussenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.