Legal Opinion · Dissent

Commonwealth v. Brandrup

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 15, 1976No. 233Published

1DissentHoffman, Judge

Appellant contends that the evidence adduced at trial by the Commonwealth varied substantially from the allegations contained in the indictment. I agree and would, therefore, order appellant discharged.

In September of 1974, a burglary occurred at Laurel Valley Auto Sales in Latrobe, Westmoreland County. Henry B. Weirs, III, the owner of Laurel Valley Auto Sales, told the State Police that a Smith and Wesson .38 caliber revolver was stolen in the burglary. Mr. Weirs also reported the serial number of the stolen revolver to the police.

On October 23, 1974, appellant brought a Camaro automobile…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PopeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Commonwealth v. SimioneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Commonwealth v. PetrilloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Commonwealth v. AurickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. Commonwealth v. LambertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API