Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Pope

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 25, 1974No. Appeal, 392PublishedCited by 83 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Eobeets,

The prosecution of Phillip Pope for violation of the Pennsylvania Uniform Firearms Act raises the narrow questions (1) whether the unlicensed carrying in Philadelphia of a rifle with a 22-inch barrel constitutes a violation of the Act, and (2) if it does, whether appellee was properly indicted for this offense. The trial court construed section 4628(e.2) of the Uniform Firearms Act 1 as proscribing only the carrying of rifles with barrels measuring less than 15 inches, and sustained Pope’s demurrer. On appeal, an equally-divided Superior Court affirmed. 2 This…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. United States v. RagenSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Sherwood v. ElgartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  5. Commonwealth v. Rieck Investment Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by83 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Commonwealth v. OhleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Jones v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Commonwealth v. DanielsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Commonwealth v. BigelowSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API