Commonwealth v. Lambert
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Hoffman, J.,
This is an appeal from a judgment of sentence for corrupting the morals of a minor. Appellant contends that his motion in arrest of judgment should have been granted because the Commonwealth failed to prove, as charged in the indictment, that appellant corrupted the morals of certain minors “in that he did furnish dangerous drugs to said minors.” Two other indictments charged the appellant with distributing dangerous drugs.
The evidence established that the twenty-three year old appellant, in response to his fifteen year old girl friend’s request, gave her six pills which…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MarlinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Commonwealth v. SimioneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Commonwealth v. PetrilloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Commonwealth v. AurickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Commonwealth v. StroikSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LandySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. MadisonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Commonwealth v. SpeightsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Commonwealth v. JacobsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. MorganSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.