Legal Opinion
Challenge Cream & Butter Assn. v. Royal Dutch Dairies
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 13, 1963No. Civ. 26444PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWood, P. J.
Appeal by defendant Royal Dutch Dairies from an order denying its motion to discharge ■ a writ of attachment. (A motion of defendants Veldhuis and Hilarides, individually, as copartners doing business as Firestone Dairies, to discharge writ of attachment [as to them] was granted.)
On March 30,1961, defendant Royal Dutch Dairies assigned its assets to defendant Richard M. Durall for the benefit of creditors. The assignee, Durall, conducted the business of Royal Dutch Dairies about nine months (until December 26) when the assignor (Royal Dutch Dairies), pursuant to court order in another action,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Major-Blakeney Corp. v. JenkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Rose v. PearmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Minor v. MinorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
3Cited by4 opinions
- Coleman Engineering Co. v. North American Aviation, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1966
- Coleman Engineering Co. v. North American Aviation, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1966
- Earhart v. William Low Co.California Supreme Court · 1979
- Earhart v. William Low Co.California Supreme Court · 1979