Canton Provision Co. v. Gauder
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
It is contended that the petition shows on its face that there is a misjoinder of parties defendant for the reason that a joint liability against them is not pleaded, and that the motion to quash was therefore properly sustained. It must be conceded that if the petition does not contain allegations showing such joint liability, service upon the defendant, The Canton Provision Company, was properly quashed. Gorey v. Black, 100 Ohio St., 73, 125 N. E., 126; Stark County Agricultural Soc. v. Brenner, an Infant, 122 Ohio St., 560, 573, 172 N. E., 659.
It has been held that a retailer of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bello v. ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1922
- Mazetti v. Armour & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
- Portage Markets Co. v. GeorgeOhio Supreme Court · 1924
- Stark County Agricultural Society v. BrennerOhio Supreme Court · 1930
- Klein v. LustOhio Supreme Court · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Lonzrick v. Republic Steel Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1966
- Losito v. Kruse, Jr.Ohio Supreme Court · 1940
- Herron v. City of YoungstownOhio Supreme Court · 1940
- Logsdon v. Main-Nottingham Investment Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1956
- Hughes Provision Co. v. La Mear Poultry & Egg Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1951
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.