Legal Opinion

Klein v. Lust

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1924No. 18169PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarshall, C. J.

This error proceeding presents two questions for the consideration of this court: First, whether Section 6308, General Code, confers jurisdiction upon a justice of the peace holding office in one of the townships of a county other than the county of defendant’s residence, the injury having occurred in a township other, than that in which the justice holds office; second, the legal effect of a motion filed by an attorney for the defendant moving for a dismissal of the cause pending before the justice of the peace, “for the reason that the court in which this action is filed has no jurisdiction…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Maholm v. MarshallOhio Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Canton Provision Co. v. GauderOhio Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Harvey v. Fiduciary Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  3. Black v. BlackOhio Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Tucker v. TuckerOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Yontz v. McCutchinOhio Supreme Court · 1929

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API