Legal Opinion

Nu Enamel Corp. v. Nate Enamel Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 1934Published

1Opinion of the CourtLauer, J.

Plaintiffs and defendants are both in the business of selling enamel, the "former advertising its products as Nu-Enamel, the latter as Duo-Enamel.

The plaintiffs seek to enjoin the defendants from selling their product under the name Duo-Enamel, from representing that their *406shops and merchandise are connected with or owned by the plaintiffs, from using certain enumerated slogans or legends in connection with the merchandising of their product, from imitating in their stores the plaintiffs’ store fronts, from using identical literature, from continuing alleged misrepresentations of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Elgin National Watch Co. v. Illinois Watch Case Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. William R. Warner & Co. v. Eli Lilly & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. G. & C. Merriam Co. v. SaalfieldCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1912
  4. Union Car Advertising Co. v. CollierNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  5. Computing Scale Co. v. Standard Computing Scale Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1902

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API