Legal Opinion

Brooks v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided February 23, 1977No. 302-75PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

This case comes before the court on plaintiffs exceptions to certain findings and to the conclusion of law and opinion filed on August 2, 1976, by Trial Judge Thomas J. Lydon. He held for defendant on the basis that plaintiff had failed to carry his burden of proving that a vital Officer Effectiveness Report (OER) was not in his selection folder when a Selection Board considered plaintiff on October 7, 1974, for promotion from captain to major, but passed him over. He held that the record as a whole justified an inference that the OER was in the selection folder.

By order of February 13, 1976,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Yee v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
  3. Charlson Realty Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  4. Gratehouse v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
  5. Richard A. Weiss v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sanders v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
  2. Tecom, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  3. Crispino v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
  4. Parsons v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
  5. Wagner v. GerenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API