Legal Opinion
Executive Benefits Insurance Agency v. Arkison
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 9, 2014No. 12-1200PublishedCited by 220 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thomas
In Stern v. Marshall, 564 U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 2594, 180 L.Ed.2d 475 (2011), this Court held that even though bankruptcy courts are statutorily authorized to enter final judgment on a class of bankruptcy-related claims, Article III of the Constitution prohibits bankruptcy courts from finally adjudicating certain of those claims. Stem did not, however, decide how bankruptcy or district courts should proceed when a “Stem claim” is identified. We hold today that when, under Stem’s reasoning, the Constitution does not permit a bankruptcy court to enter final judgment on a bankruptcy-related claim,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Stern v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Granfinanciera, S.A. v. NordbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- New York v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Celotex Corp. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by220 opinions
- Coleman v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- Diana Houck v. Substitute Trustee ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
- U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. Verizon Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
- Deitz v. FordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Wellness International Network, Ltd. v. SharifSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
215 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.