Legal Opinion
Deitz v. Ford
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 28, 2014No. 12-60036PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Chapter 7 debtor Shawn Deitz seeks review of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s (“BAP”) judgment affirming the bankruptcy court’s judgment (1) awarding money damages to creditors Wayne and Patricia Ford; and (2) ordering that the Fords’ claim be excepted from discharge. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d), and we affirm.1
This court reviews decisions of the BAP de novo and applies the same standard of review that the BAP applied to the bankruptcy court’s ruling. In re Boyajian, 564 F.3d 1088, 1090 (9th Cir.2009). In our review, we conclude that the well-reasoned majority opinion…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Stern v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- In Re Pacor, Inc. v. John Higgins, Jr. And Louise HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Miller v. GammieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Thomas v. Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Harvey v. Dambowsky (In re Dambowsky)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2015
- In re: Malcolm Curtis and Judith CurtisUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Larson v. Bayer (In re Bayer)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Helvetia Asset Recovery, Inc. v. Kahn (In re Kahn)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 2015
- 3N International, Inc. v. Carrano (In re Carrano)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 2015
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.