Legal Opinion

Lawless v. Tuthill

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 12, 1924No. Nos. 11815, 13243, ConsolidatedPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

LYONS, C.

Plaintiff sued defendants to recover the sum of $1,000, with interest thereon from the 9th day of June, 1910, at the rate of four per cent, per annum, together with costs.

The basis of plaintiff’s claim was a cashier’s check made payable to the plaintiff and left as security with the defendants as an- indemnity against any liability which might be enforced against the -sureties on a certain undertaking in attachment. The defendant Tuthill was one of the sureties

It is conceded in the case that the sureties on such undertaking were exonerated without having been ™*w>n to make…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mendenhall v. Harrisburg Water Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Walker v. O'ConnellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1898
  3. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. HolmesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
  4. Northwest Thresher Co. v. McNinchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  5. Heywood v. Doernbecher Mfg. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1906

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Reserve Loan Life Ins. Co. v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  2. Washington v. Mechanics Traders Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Upham Shoe Co. v. PollardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. Saunders v. McKeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  5. Pinkstaff v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API