Legal Opinion
Upham Shoe Co. v. Pollard
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 8, 1925No. 15385PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
PINKHAM, C.
This action was instituted by Upham Shoe Company, as plaintiff, against T. H. Pollard, defendant, to recover the sum of $407.74, upon an itemized and verified statement of account. The petition alleges “that no part thereof has been paid.”
"The defendant filed a motion to make the petition more definite and certain by requiring the plaintiff to set forth as exhibits to its petition all unpaid checks given to plaintiff by defendant, together with all other commercial paper received by plaintiff in payment of the account sued on. This motion was overruled. The defendant…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Terrapin v. BarkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Cox v. GettysSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Muskogee Vitrified Brick Co. v. NapierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Ince Nursery Co. v. SamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Salazar v. SmartMontana Supreme Court · 1892
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
- Reserve Loan Life Ins. Co. v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Washington v. Mechanics Traders Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Sullins v. DomerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Saunders v. McKeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.