Legal Opinion

Pinkstaff v. State

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 29, 1925No. 15823PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

THOMPSON, C.

This action is a bastardy proceeding instituted in the county court of Noble county by the county attorney of said county in the name of the state of Oklahoma, defendant in error, as plaintiff below, against Dock Pinkstaff, plaintiff in er.ror, defendant below. The parties will be referred to in this opinion as plaintiff and defendant, as they appeared in the lower court.

The information was filed on the 21st day of June, 1923, and is as follows:

“Comes now Joe W. Howard, county attorney in and for the state and county aforesaid, and in the name and by the authority of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Mendenhall v. Harrisburg Water Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Walker v. O'ConnellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1898
  3. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. HolmesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
  4. Northwest Thresher Co. v. McNinchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  5. Heywood v. Doernbecher Mfg. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1906

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Krieger v. MarshallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  2. City of McAlester v. KingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
  3. Tiger v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  4. Cash v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  5. Krieger v. MarshallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API