Legal Opinion

Arneil v. Schnitzer

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 14, 1943PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

This is an appeal by the defendants from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, based upon a verdict. The judgment was entered in an action in which the plaintiff charged that the defendants so negligently maintained their premises that a fire started thereon and, escaping therefrom, destroyed property belonging to the plaintiff and other properties belonging to twenty-four individuals who assigned their claims to him. The total sum awarded by the challenged judgment is $8,166.48.

The assignments of error are six in number. The first is based upon an order which denied a motion made by the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Stone v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
  2. Moody v. Gufl Refining Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Leahy v. Standard Oil Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  4. Aune v. Oregon Trunk RailwayOregon Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Eastman v. Jennings-McRae Logging Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1914

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Menth v. Breeze Corporation, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
  2. Britton v. WootenKentucky Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Eitel v. Times, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Amphitheaters, Inc. v. Portland MeadowsOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Hills v. McGillvreyOregon Supreme Court · 1965

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API