State Ex Rel. Quimby v. City of Reno
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Badt, J.:
Relators filed a proceeding in the nature of a quo warranto in the court below to set aside an ordinance of the city of Reno annexing certain adjacent territory. The district court dismissed the second amended complaint without leave to amend, holding that the complaint, which attacked the annexation ordinance on the ground that the petition for annexation did not contain the number of signatures required by the statute, did not state a claim upon which relief could be granted in the absence of allegations of abuse of discretion, want of good faith or fraud.
The…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Board of Commissioners v. MarkleIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- People v. Town of OntarioCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Town of South Tucson v. Board of SupervisorsArizona Supreme Court · 1938
- People Ex Rel. Skelton v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- People Ex Rel. Russell v. Town of LoyaltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Beebe v. KoontzNevada Supreme Court · 1956
- State Ex Rel. Pickrell v. DowneyArizona Supreme Court · 1967
- Incorporation of the City of Mesa Vista v. PelhamNevada Supreme Court · 1988
- Rea v. City of RenoNevada Supreme Court · 1960
- Rea v. City of RenoNevada Supreme Court · 1960