Legal Opinion
Pine Terrace Apartments, L.P. v. Windscape, LLC
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 12, 2009No. F054609PublishedCited by 3 opinions
[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DAWSON, J.
This appeal involves allegations of latent construction defects and the application of the 10-year statute of limitations set forth in Code of Civil Procedure section 337.15. 1
The buyer of an apartment complex sued the developer and seller after discovering that all of the windows in the complex lacked flashing, which led to water and mold damage. The developer and seller filed a cross-complaint for indemnification against various subcontractors.
Three subcontractors moved for summary judgment on the cross-complaint on the ground it was barred by section 337.15. The superior…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lantzy v. Centex HomesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Valley Circle Estates v. VTN Consolidated, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1983
- Acosta v. Glenfed Development Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- Republic Bank v. Marine National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Estate of DargieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Yu v. Liberty Surplus Ins. Corp., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Mettler v. Government Employees Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020
- Yu v. Liberty Surplus Ins. Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2019