Legal Opinion

Yu v. Liberty Surplus Ins. Corp.

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided December 11, 2018No. G054522PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, ACTING P. J.

*1027Generally, as a fundamental rule, when a civil litigant sues for monetary damages, "the amount demanded must be stated." ( Code Civ. Proc., § 425.10, subd. (a)(2).)1 A demand for "damages according to proof" is insufficient; such a demand does not *104provide adequate notice to sustain a default judgment. (§ 585, subds. (a) & (b).)

Here, Bann-Shiang Liza Yu hired Automatic Teller Modules, Inc. (ATMI), a general contractor, to design and build a hotel. After the hotel opened, Yu filed a complaint against ATMI for construction defects, praying for "not less than $10 million…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Angelucci v. Century Supper ClubCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Greenup v. RodmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Rochin v. Pat Johnson Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. Sickle v. GilbertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. Engebretson & Co. v. HarrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ins. Co. of Pa. v. Am. Safety Indem. Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  2. Daneshmand v. City of San Juan CapistranoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
  3. Daneshmand v. City of San Juan Capistrano CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2021
  4. Ins. Co. of St. of PA v. Amer. Safety Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 2019
  5. Radovic v. Brilliant CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API