Legal Opinion

PAUL D. v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 27, 1984No. B005814PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT. *

Opinion and Order

Paul D., a minor, petitions for a writ of mandate or prohibition to compel respondent court to order the probation department (department) to exercise its discretion and evaluate petitioner for informal supervision pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 654, 1 in accordance with the factors set forth in California Rules of Court, rule 1307. Two questions are presented: First, whether the department abused its discretion in refusing to evaluate petitioner for supervision under section 654, in adherence with its policy not to consider a minor for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re William M.California Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Charles S. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Cantillon v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. ALSAVON M. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  5. RAYMOND B. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re ChavezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  2. People v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Datig v. Dove Books, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1999
  4. MARK F. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. Matter of Personal Restraint of TapleyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API