Legal Opinion
Crain v. First National Bank of Oregon
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 13, 1963No. 18564PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BEEKS, District Judge.
Appellants are Indians enrolled in the Klamath Tribe. They brought separate actions in the district court against appellee. The First National Bank of Oregon, Portland, for declaratory judgment holding (1) the provisions of the Klamath Termination Act, 25 U.S.C. §§ 564-564x, providing for the placing of funds of Indians determined by the Secretary of the Interior to be in need of assistance in private trusts to be unconstitutional, and (2) the balloting procedure required by Section 564d of that Act was not followed. The United States intervened pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Carlson v. LandonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- United States v. KagamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Sterling v. ConstantinSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Tiger v. Western Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Reyos v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
- Wylie Bros. Contracting Co. v. Albuquerque-Bernalillo County Air Quality Control BoardNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
- Republic Industries, Inc. v. Central Pennsylvania Teamsters Pension FundDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
- Logan v. AndrusDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1978
- Vigil v. AndrusCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.