Legal Opinion
Reyos v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 19, 1970No. Nos. 40-69, 41-69, 42-69, 43-69, 44-69PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SETH, Circuit Judge.
These suits were commenced by eighty-five individuals with whom the United States originally had full trust relationship as Indians of the Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation in Utah. Of this group of plaintiffs twelve individuals were selected by the parties as the ones whose cases would be tried first as test cases. These are referred to as the “designated” plaintiffs and are the appellees herein.
An Act of Congress directed that the federal trust relationship with the mixed-bloods of the Tribe be terminated, and the tribal property be divided between the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Menominee Tribe of Indians v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Tiger v. Western Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Fischman v. Raytheon Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- Kardon v. National Gypsum Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1946
- List v. Fashion Park, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- White v. AbramsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Charles William KunzmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,744 K. Jay Holdsworth and Dona S. Holdsworth v. Kline D. Strong, Securities and Exchange Commission, Amicus CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
- Paul F. Newton & Co. v. Texas Commerce BankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- In Re Intelligroup Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2007
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.