Starling v. Taylor
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtMorris, J.
Although portions of the original trust indenture are set out in the facts, the indenture itself is not before the Court for construction. We, therefore, consider it only as the instruments before us for construction relate to it.
We must first determine what legal effect, if any, is to be given to the memorandum of agreement executed on 23 December 1946, purporting to extend the original trust indenture for 10 years beyond its stated date of termination. It is clear that the extension of a trust beyond its stated duration amounts to a modification. The rules generally applicable to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gould Morris Electric Co. v. Atlantic Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Smyth v. . McKissickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Finch v. HoneycuttSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- WACHOVIA BANK & TRUST COMPANY v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- City of Washington v. EllsworthSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
3Cited by7 opinions
- Baxter v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
- Moore v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Gold v. PriceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
- Fulk & Needham, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1968
- Wachovia Bank & Trust Co., N.A. v. SevierCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.