Legal Opinion

People v. Seals

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 18, 2013PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Walsh, J.), dated January 30, 2012, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The People presented clear and convincing evidence to support a risk level three classification (see Correction Law § 168-n [3]; People v Pettigrew, 14 NY3d 406 [2010]; People v Mingo, 12 NY3d 563 [2009]; People v Gilligan, 94 AD3d 844 [2012]). The defendant’s contention that the hearing court should not have…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. WyattAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. People v. MingoNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. People v. PettigrewNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. People v. MabeeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  5. People v. SinclairAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. BlaylockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  2. People v. MartinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API