Legal Opinion
VIZIO, Inc. v. Klee
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided December 22, 2016No. 15-CV-929 (VAB)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS
Victor A. Bolden, United States District Judge
Plaintiff, VIZIO, Inc. (“VIZIO”), brought this action against Defendant, the *91Commissioner of the State of Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection, challenging the constitutionality of Connecticut’s E-Waste Law. ECF No. 1.
Defendant previously filed a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6), arguing that VIZIO had failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. ECF No. 21. The Court granted the motion to dismiss the Complaint in its entirety, dismissing all of VIZIO’s claims with prejudice,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Brown-Forman Distillers Corp. v. New York State Liquor AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Baldwin v. G. A. F. Seelig, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Healy v. Beer InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Vizio, Inc. v. KleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
- VIZIO, Inc. v. KleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018