Legal Opinion

Vizio, Inc. v. Klee

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 29, 2018No. 17-227-cv; August Term 2017PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICHARD W. GOLDBERG, Judge:

*252Plaintiff-Appellant VIZIO, Inc. is a manufacturer of televisions sold nationwide, including in Connecticut. VIZIO challenges Connecticut's statute and regulations creating and implementing its electronic recycling program, Conn. Gen. Stat. §§ 22a-629 et seq. ; Conn. Agencies Regs. §§ 22a-630(d)-1, 22a-638-1 (collectively "Connecticut's E-Waste Law"), on the grounds that they effectively regulate interstate commerce in violation of the Commerce Clause, U.S. CONST . art. I, § 8, cl. 3.

Such a dormant Commerce Clause claim is analyzed through a "well-worn path," see…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. City of Philadelphia v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Oregon Waste Systems, Inc. v. Department of Environmental Quality of Ore.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Edgar v. Mite Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Tripathy v. McKoyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2024
  2. Grand River Enterprises v. BoughtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021
  3. Thomas Styczinski v. Grace ArnoldCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022
  4. Grand River Enterprises Six Nations LTD v. SullivanDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2020
  5. Johns v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2024

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API