Drainage District Number 23 of New Madrid County v. Hetlage
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtFulbright, J.
In order to better understand the issues in this' lease, the pleadings are set out at length. Omitting the formal parts, the petition-and amended answer follow:
Petition.
I Plaintiff states that it is now and was at all times hereinafter Imentioned, a corporation formed, organized, and existing under and Iby virtue of the laws of the State of Missouri, relative to Drain-lage Districts.
I Plaintiff further states that on the 30th day of October, 1934, the |iollowing described real estate situated in New Madrid County, Mis-louri, to-wit:
South one-half (!) of Section Twenty-two (22), Township…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ex Parte Keane v. StrodtmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1929
- United States v. BashawCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1892
- State Ex Inf. Atty-Gen. v. Long-Bell Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1928
- Little River Drainage District v. SheppardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
- McAnally v. Little River Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Rouveyrol v. DonnellySupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
- Drainage District No. 48 of Dunklin County v. SmallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
- Davis v. StephensSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
- Goldfield Consolidated Mines Co. v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1940
- Kostman v. Pine Lawn Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.