Legal Opinion
Drainage District No. 48 of Dunklin County v. Small
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided December 8, 1958No. 46867PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HYDE, Judge.
Action to abate a nuisance, claimed to ■have been created by a private levee built by defendants, and for injunctive relief against its maintenance. The trial court found for defendants except as to a part of the levee which defendants agreed they had no right to maintain. On appeal, the judgment was affirmed -by the Springfield Court of Appeals. Drainage District No. 48 of Dunklin County v. Small, Mo.App., 311 S.W.2d 29. On application of the drainage districts involved we ordered transfer.
The substance of the pleadings is stated in the opinion of the Court of Appeals (311 S.W.2d…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Maricopa County v. Valley Nat. Bank of PhoenixSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- State ex rel. Applegate v. TaylorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
- Anderson v. Inter-River Drainage & Levee DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 1925
- State Ex Rel. Drainage District No. 8 v. DuncanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Page v. Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
- Benson v. FeketeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
- Hall v. AllenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
- Guerin v. YocumMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
- Auxier v. HolmesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.