Legal Opinion · Dissent

National Labor Relations Board v. Action Automotive, Inc.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 15, 1985No. 83-1416Published

1Dissent

Justice Stevens, with whom Justice Rehnquist and Justice O’Connor join,

dissenting.

In my opinion, bargaining unit determinations should be based on job characteristics and not on an employee’s opinion about unions. Antiunion sentiment may be based on religious views, political convictions, individual respect or hostility, or family considerations. If the characteristics of an employee’s job are the same as those of pro-union employees, that employee has the same right to membership in the bargaining unit as a union official or his wife.

The majority’s decision prevents the two employees…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Allied Chemical & Alkali Workers of America, Local Union No. 1 v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Yeshiva UniversitySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. Savair Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. National Labor Relations Board v. Hendricks County Rural Electric Membership Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API