Legal Opinion

Mulligan v. F. S. Electric

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 27, 1994No. 14981PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.

The issues in this appeal and cross appeal are: (1) under General Statutes § Sl-SOTb,1 the extent *531to which an employee must recover from an injury prior to returning to work in order to qualify for workers’ compensation benefits under General Statutes (Rev. to 1989) § 31-307b after a relapse from recovery; and (2) whether an injured employee’s workers’ compensation benefit rate, as defined by General Statutes (Rev. to 1989) §§ 31-307 and 31-310, 2 should be determined, *532in the case of a traumatic injury, by reference to the employee’s earnings preceding the date on which he was injured or…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. In re Valerie D.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  2. Ambroise v. William Raveis Real Estate, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  3. Lauer v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  4. State v. MetzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  5. Crochiere v. Board of Education of Town of EnfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Rayhall v. Akim Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  2. Doe v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  3. Williams v. Best Cleaners, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  4. Green v. General Dynamics Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  5. Rice v. Vermilyn Brown, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API