Legal Opinion
Goradia v. Hahn Co.
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided April 30, 1991No. 19496PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SOSA, Chief Justice.
Plaintiff-appellant, Ravindra Goradia (Goradia), appeals grant of summary judgment to defendant-appellee, Hahn Company (Hahn). The essence of Goradia’s complaint 1 was that Hahn discriminated against Goradia on the basis of his national origin (East Indian) when Hahn refused to renew a lease Goradia had on a space in a shopping center which Hahn managed and in which Goradia had been a tenant for some eight years.
The record discloses the following pertinent facts. Goradia, a dominant shareholder in La Fama, Inc. (La Fama), sold Indian clothing in La Fama’s store. It…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Goodman v. Brock Ex Rel. Estate of BrockNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Brill v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Bartlett v. MirabalNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2000
- Narney v. DanielsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1992
- McNeill v. Rice Engineering & Operating, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
- Mayfield Smithson Enterprises v. Com-Quip, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.