Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Grievance Administrator v. August

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 1991No. Docket 88132; Calendar 6PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoyle, J.

We are asked to review the Attorney Discipline Board’s order reinstating the license of Irving August to practice law in the State of Michigan. We vacate the Attorney Discipline Board’s order of reinstatement, and remand to the board for reconsideration in light of this opinion.

FACTS

On June 28, 1983, petitioner was convicted of conspiring to defraud the United States of the due administration of justice in violation of 18 USC 371, impeding the due administration of justice in violation of 18 USC 1503, and attempting to influence a court clerk in the discharge of her official duties in…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. In the Matter of HissMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  2. In Re: BrownWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Matter of Reinstatement of CantrellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  4. In re KeenanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  5. Matter of KerrDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Grievance Administrator v. LopatinMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  2. In Re Robert Matthew BristolNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Grievance Administrator v. FriedMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
  4. In re Reinstatement of AugustMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  5. In re RomanoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API