Carroll Electric Cooperative Corp. v. Benson
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Jack Holt, Jr., Justice.
The issue presented is whether the appellant, Carroll Electric Cooperative Corporation (hereafter “Carroll Electric”), had a right pursuant to a 1962 easement to extend certain existing power lines across the western portion of appellees’, Joe and Amelia Benson (hereafter “the Bensons”), property or was required to acquire a new easement. We hold that the trial court erred in determining that Carroll Electric could not extend this power line under a 1962 easement but remand to the trial court for its determination of the reasonableness of the route chosen for the line.
O…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fulcher v. Dierks Lumber & Coal Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
- Drainage Dist. No. 16, Miss. Cty. v. Holly RoachSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
- Bradley v. Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
- Ark. Valley Electric Cooperative Corp. v. BrinksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sunnyside Valley Irrigation District v. DickieWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- Sunnyside Valley Irr. Dist. v. DickieWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- USA Cartage Leasing, LLC v. BaerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2011
- Howard v. CramletCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997
- Carroll Electric Cooperative Corp. v. BensonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.