Drainage Dist. No. 16, Miss. Cty. v. Holly Roach
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Ed. F. McFaddin, Justice.
These two cases were separately appealed and briefed; but the evidence is identical and the questions may be settled in one opinion. They are: (1) What are the boundaries of the present right-of-way of the District? and (2) Has the District abandoned its old right-of-way?
Drainage District No. 16 of Mississippi County (here referred to as District) was established by'order of the County Court in 1915 under the Alternative Drainage District Law of Arkansas (% 4455 et seq., Pope’s Digest 1 ). For the purpose of draining and protecting against overflows approximately…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Grafton v. . MoirNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Fulcher v. Dierks Lumber & Coal Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
- Patterson Orchard Co. v. Southwest Arkansas Utilities Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
- Gurdon & Fort Smith Railroad v. VaughtSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
- McKenney v. McKenneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Hatfield v. Arkansas Western Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1982
- Goodwin v. LoftonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1984
- Brewer and Taylor Co. v. WallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
- Howard v. CramletCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997
- Carroll Electric Cooperative Corp. v. BensonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.