Legal Opinion

Drainage Dist. No. 16, Miss. Cty. v. Holly Roach

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 11, 1948No. Nos. 4-8560, 4-8561 (consolidated)PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ed. F. McFaddin, Justice.

These two cases were separately appealed and briefed; but the evidence is identical and the questions may be settled in one opinion. They are: (1) What are the boundaries of the present right-of-way of the District? and (2) Has the District abandoned its old right-of-way?

Drainage District No. 16 of Mississippi County (here referred to as District) was established by'order of the County Court in 1915 under the Alternative Drainage District Law of Arkansas (% 4455 et seq., Pope’s Digest 1 ). For the purpose of draining and protecting against overflows approximately…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Grafton v. . MoirNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Fulcher v. Dierks Lumber & Coal Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
  3. Patterson Orchard Co. v. Southwest Arkansas Utilities Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  4. Gurdon & Fort Smith Railroad v. VaughtSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
  5. McKenney v. McKenneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hatfield v. Arkansas Western Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1982
  2. Goodwin v. LoftonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1984
  3. Brewer and Taylor Co. v. WallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  4. Howard v. CramletCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997
  5. Carroll Electric Cooperative Corp. v. BensonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API