Legal Opinion

Ray v. Ray

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1973No. 195PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.

Two issues are presented on this appeal:

Was it error for the trial court not to make its own independent determination, apart from the agreement, that plaintiff was adequately provided for; and

Is a postnuptial agreement which settles all property rights between the parties, including future alimony, void as against public policy.

Independent determination by trial court.

In its memorandum decision the trial court stated:

“The court finds it virtually unnecessary to determine whether or not the plaintiff in this case has been adequately provided for . . . .” It is evident from a careful reading…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Miner v. MinerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Bliwas v. BliwasWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Madison Bank & Trust Co. v. BeatWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Cortte v. TolzmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Nickolay v. Estate of NickolayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1946

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Leighton v. LeightonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Schmitz v. SchmitzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  3. In RE MARRIAGE OF NICHOLS v. NicholsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  4. In RE MARRIAGE OF VAN BOXTEL v. Van BoxtelWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  5. In RE MARRIAGE OF NICHOLS v. NicholsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API