Legal Opinion

Madison Bank & Trust Co. v. Beat

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1964PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.

Two issues are presented by the contest over the postnuptial agreement:

First: Is the postnuptial agreement valid ?

Second: May the widow elect under sec. 233.12, Stats., to take her share as provided by law rather than by the post-nuptial agreement ?

Validity of Postnuptial Agreement.

Postnuptial agreements are permitted in Wisconsin. Nevertheless, the trial court found this agreement to be “void and of no legal effect” specifically finding:

“8. That the said petitioner, Helen Docken Beat, was persuaded by the decedent to sign the marital agreement dated March 9, 1959, without knowledge or effect…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Wait v. PierceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Knippel v. Marshall & Ilsley BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Bibelhausen v. BibelhausenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Curkeet v. EisenbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Fricke v. FrickeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1950

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Schutterle v. SchutterleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Hartz v. HartzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  3. Guinther v. SchuchtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Acme Equipment Corp. v. Montgomery Co-operative Creamery Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Klapps v. American Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API