Madison Bank & Trust Co. v. Beat
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.
Two issues are presented by the contest over the postnuptial agreement:
First: Is the postnuptial agreement valid ?
Second: May the widow elect under sec. 233.12, Stats., to take her share as provided by law rather than by the post-nuptial agreement ?
Validity of Postnuptial Agreement.
Postnuptial agreements are permitted in Wisconsin. Nevertheless, the trial court found this agreement to be “void and of no legal effect” specifically finding:
“8. That the said petitioner, Helen Docken Beat, was persuaded by the decedent to sign the marital agreement dated March 9, 1959, without knowledge or effect…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Wait v. PierceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
- Knippel v. Marshall & Ilsley BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
- Bibelhausen v. BibelhausenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
- Curkeet v. EisenbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Fricke v. FrickeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1950
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Schutterle v. SchutterleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- Hartz v. HartzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
- Guinther v. SchuchtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Acme Equipment Corp. v. Montgomery Co-operative Creamery Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Klapps v. American Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.