Legal Opinion

Elizabeth City Water & Power Co. v. City of Elizabeth City

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 1, 1924PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.

From the oral argument of this case we were impressed with the idea that perhaps the city of Elizabeth City had violated some legal rights of .the plaintiff, the Elizabeth City "Water and Power Company. From a thorough examination of the record, we are of the opinion that the defendant, city of Elizabeth City, was in its legal rights, and under the law had full power and authority to do all the acts and things complained of by the plaintiff.

The plaintiff’s complaint, stripped of all technicalities, in a “nutshell,” is that the defendant, the city of Elizabeth City, is about to start a rival…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Walla Walla City v. Walla Walla Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. City and County of Denver v. Denver Union Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  3. Hamilton Gas Light & Coke Co. v. Hamilton CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. Knoxville Water Co. v. KnoxvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  5. New Orleans Water-Works Co. v. RiversSupreme Court of the United States · 1885

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State v. . FowlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  2. City of Roswell, N.M. v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
  3. Cole v. WagnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  4. Madison Cablevision, Inc. v. City of MorgantonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  5. Hopkins v. . BarnhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API