Legal Opinion

State v. . Fowler

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 23, 1927PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

For the first offense section 2 imposes a fine; for the second or further similar offense, imprisonment for a term not less than six months nor more than two years. The defendant admitted that he had previously been convicted in the Federal Court; and for this reason, according to a recital in the judgment, he was sentenced to imprisonment in the present case; but the aggravated punishment prescribed for a subsequent conviction cannot be imposed unless the prior conviction, which is an essential part of the description of the second offense, is. charged in the indictment. C. S., 4617; S. v.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Barbier v. ConnollySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fé Railway Co. v. EllisSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Connolly v. Union Sewer Pipe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
  4. State v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  5. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1902

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. State v. BentonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. State v. . HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. State v. DelossantosSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  4. Dunn v. PateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  5. State v. ShondelUtah Supreme Court · 1969

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API