Legal Opinion
Connolly v. Bell
New York Court of Appeals
Decided February 17, 1956PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Conway, Ch. J.
This is an action upon a judgment of the Supreme Court of New Jersey. The following is a summary of the background of the litigation.
*585Sometime during 1946 a group of men — the defendants Bell, Christensen, Banff, Ketcham, Nongard, Parks and Clifford R. Powell (but not the partnership of Ketcham & Nongard as such, and not the individual defendant Murray) — organized themselves as a syndicate to acquire two bridges across the Delaware River: the Burlington-Bristol Bridge and the TaconyPalmyra Bridge, both of which were then owned by private corporations. In December, 1946,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Reynolds v. StocktonSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Standard Oil Co. of Ind. v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Connolly v. BellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
3Cited by7 opinions
- In re the Final Accounting of Morgan Guaranty Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1971
- Lopez v. Board of TrusteesHawaii Supreme Court · 1983
- Republic of the Philippines v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
- Komatsu v. Board of Trustees, Employees' Retirement SystemHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1984
- Kupersmidt v. New York Telephone Co.New York Supreme Court · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.