Legal Opinion
Republic of the Philippines v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided May 5, 1993No. Civ. 88-5150PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DEBEVOISE, District Judge.
The Republic of the Philippines (the “Republic”) and the National Power Corporation (“NPC”) instituted this action against Westinghouse Electric Corporation and Westinghouse International Projects Company (collectively, “Westinghouse”) and Burns & Roe Enterprises, Inc. (“Burns & Roe”), asserting fifteen tort and contract claims. Thirteen of these claims were referred to arbitration, and the remaining two claims are the subject of a trial now underway. In these two claims, the Republic alleges that Defendants bribed President Ferdinand E. Marcos in order to…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. HaslipSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Memphis Community School District v. StachuraSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Yahoo! Inc. v. La Ligue Contre Le Racisme Et L'antisemitismeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Cosgrove v. Williamsburg of Cincinnati Mgt. Co., Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
- Yahoo! Inc. v. La Ligue Contre Le Racisme Et L'antisemitismeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Cosgrove v. Williamsburg of Cincinnati Management Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
- Yahoo Inc. v. La Ligue Contre Le Racisme Et L'AntisemitismeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006